Search   |     Toll free: +1-800-447-9407   |     support@s2mtrainings.com

Superior Quality Mgt

Instructor Charles H. Paul 
Webinar ID 93851
39 Days Left To REGISTER

Date Friday, January 23, 2026
Time 10:00 AM PST | 01:00 PM EST
Duration 60 Minutes  

Webinar Price Details

Overview

Supplier quality management has become one of the most critical components of compliance in life sciences manufacturing and research. As pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device organizations increasingly outsource raw materials, components, testing, sterilization, logistics, and even entire manufacturing stages, the supply chain has emerged as a direct extension of the regulated facility. Regulators worldwide now view suppliers as integral contributors to product safety, efficacy, and patient protection-whether they produce a sterile stopper, a chromatography resin, an excipient, a peptide, or cloud-based laboratory software.

Historically, supplier oversight was treated as a procurement or purchasing function focused on cost and delivery. In today’s regulatory environment, this approach is not only outdated-it is dangerous. FDA, EMA, MHRA, WHO, ICH, and notified bodies continually emphasize that quality responsibility can never be delegated. A life sciences company remains fully accountable for the materials and services it relies upon, regardless of contract terms or supplier assurances. This means organizations must design a structured, lifecycle-based supplier quality program that evaluates, approves, monitors, and-when necessary-remediates or discontinues relationships to protect patient safety and ensure regulatory compliance.

A robust supplier management system begins with risk-based qualification. Not all suppliers present the same level of impact. Critical suppliers-such as API manufacturers, sterilization vendors, contract labs, cold-chain logistics providers, and CMOs-require deeper scrutiny, technical agreements, documented audits, data integrity evaluation, and ongoing risk monitoring. Lower-risk suppliers may require lighter qualification and fewer controls. Effective programs score suppliers based on quality history, regulatory compliance, change sensitivity, and influence on product quality attributes. This risk scoring determines the depth of audits, sampling intensity for incoming inspection, and the frequency of requalification.

Once onboarded, suppliers must be governed with structured ongoing oversight. Organizations must proactively assess supplier performance using measurable KPIs, such as on-time delivery, deviation rate, audit findings, change notifications, and complaint trends. Incoming material controls should not rely solely on Certificates of Analysis; regulators expect companies to verify critical attributes and confirm that identity testing and validated methods are appropriately applied. When failures occur, investigation responsibilities must be clearly defined through Quality Technical Agreements (QTAs or QAAs), including the ownership of CAPA activities and timelines for remediation.

Supplier change control is another major regulatory focus area. Any process, specification, method, equipment, location, or technology change must be transparently communicated and evaluated before implementation. Failure to control supplier changes has led to numerous warning letters, product recalls, sterility breaches, and adverse event risk. As digital laboratory and manufacturing systems expand, SaaS and software vendors now represent a new category of suppliers where data integrity, access control, and audit trail capability must be evaluated with the same rigor as physical goods.

Ultimately, supplier quality management is not transactional-it is a strategic, science-based discipline that protects patients, maintains business continuity, and ensures regulatory success. A strong supplier quality system integrates risk management, technical expertise, and continuous oversight to build a compliant, resilient, and reliable supply chain.

Why should you Attend

Supplier quality failures are among the fastest-growing causes of FDA warning letters, product recalls, supply shortages, and delayed approvals across the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device sectors. Regulatory agencies are making it clear: a company is fully responsible for the quality of every material, service, and outsourced activity-regardless of who performs the work. This means traditional purchasing-driven approaches are no longer enough. Organizations must build robust, risk-based supplier quality systems that proactively prevent compliance and product failures rather than simply reacting to them.

This webinar will show you how to transform supplier oversight into a structured, lifecycle-driven system that aligns with current FDA, EMA, MHRA, ICH Q10, EU MDR/IVDR, and WHO expectations. Participants will learn how to evaluate supplier risks, qualify and categorize vendors, develop meaningful Quality Technical Agreements, and monitor performance through measurable metrics and change-control processes. You will also gain insight into managing high-risk and specialized suppliers-including CMOs, CROs, sterilization vendors, SaaS providers, and cold-chain logistics partners.

Whether your role involves quality, lab operations, supply chain, manufacturing, regulatory compliance, or vendor management, this session will help you strengthen supplier reliability, protect product quality, reduce audit risk, and maintain a compliant, resilient supply chain.

Areas Covered in the Session

  • Introduction & Purpose (3-5 min)
    • Why supplier quality failures are high-risk in regulated environments
    • Shift from transactional purchasing to formalized quality oversight
    • Regulatory focus on material traceability, qualification, data reliability
    • Objective: build a lifecycle-based supplier quality system
  • Regulatory Expectations (10 min)
    • FDA: 21 CFR 210/211, 820/QMSR, Part 11 (if electronic supplier data involved)
    • EU MDR/IVDR: supply chain controls, notified body scrutiny
    • ICH Q10 & ICH Q7 responsibilities for outsourced processes
    • PIC/S, WHO expectations for supplier oversight
    • Third-party is not a shield-responsibility cannot be delegated
    • Requirements for documentation, traceability, and change control
  • Supplier Lifecycle Management (12 min)
    • Risk-based supplier qualification and categorization
    • Initial audits and capability assessments
    • Technical agreements (QTA, QAA) defining controls and responsibilities
    • Onboarding requirements: data, specifications, testing, change notification
    • Criteria for approving critical vs. non-critical suppliers
  • Ongoing Monitoring & Control (12 min)
    • Performance metrics/KPIs for suppliers
    • Certificate of Analysis (CoA) verification and incoming inspection strategy
    • Handling nonconformance, CAPA expectations, and investigation roles
    • Supplier change control: notification, impact assessment, and re-qualification
    • Continuous risk assessment and re-scoring of suppliers
    • Remote and hybrid audit strategy post-COVID
  • Managing High-Risk and Specialized Suppliers (10 min)
    • APIs, excipients, sterile materials, biologics, clinical supplies
    • Labs, contract manufacturers (CMOs), contract research organizations (CROs)
    • Cold-chain logistics, sterilization vendors, software/SaaS providers (Part 11)
    • Outsourced testing and data integrity risk
    • Data reliability from external partners
  • Case Scenarios / Mini-Exercises (8 min)
    • CoA discrepancies on a critical raw material
    • Supplier implements process changes without notification
    • CMO batch failure-ownership of CAPA and investigation
    • Software supplier unable to provide audit trail documentation
    • Discussion: what oversight was missing?
  • Summary & Q&A (3-5 min)
    • Supplier oversight is an end-to-end lifecycle
    • Quality responsibility cannot be outsourced
    • Technology, agreements, and risk scoring are central tools
    • Aim: build a resilient, preventive supplier quality program
    • Q&A

Who Will Benefit

  • Quality Assurance
  • Quality Control
  • Regulatory Affairs
  • Supply Chain
  • Procurement
  • Manufacturing
  • Operations
  • Research & Development
  • Engineering
  • Validation
  • Materials Management
  • Warehousing
  • Executive Leadership
  • Risk Management

Speaker Profile

Charles H. Paul is the President of C. H. Paul Consulting, Inc. - a regulatory, manufacturing, training, and technical documentation consulting firm - celebrating its twentieth year in business in 2017. He has been a regulatory and management consultant and an Instructional Technologist for 30 years and has published numerous white papers on various regulatory and training subjects. The firm works with both domestic and international clients designing solutions for complex training and documentation issues.

He has held senior positions in consulting and in corporate training development prior to forming C. H. Paul Consulting, Inc. He also worked for several years in government contracting managing the development of significant Army-wide training development contracts impacting virtually all of the active Army and changing the training paradigm throughout the military.

He has dedicated his entire professional career explaining the benefits of performance-based training